Climate Change Awareness and Sustainable Travel Intentions: The Mediating Role of Climate Anxiety

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29036/v0wmyc78

Keywords:

sustainable tourism, climate anxiety, climate change awareness, structural equation modelling.

Abstract

Recently, climate anxiety, climate change consciousness, and the adoption of sustainable travel practices have been considered key elements of the tourism industry.  In this context, the relationships between these variables have been analyzed from a holistic perspective. The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of climate awareness on the adoption of sustainable travel intentions. Moreover, the mediating role of climate anxiety in the aforementioned relationship has also been investigated in the research. 470 guests who visited Turkey throughout 2025 were surveyed as part of the study. The data collected have been analyzed using the New Ecological Paradigm, Climate Anxiety, and Environmentally Responsible Behavior Scales. The analysis has indicated a significant positive relationship between climate awareness and sustainable travel intention. It has also been found that climate anxiety strengthens this connection. Additionally, the partial mediating role of climate anxiety in the relationship between climate awareness and behavioral intention has been determined using structural equation modeling. In addition to these, demographic analysis has revealed that female and younger participants have higher levels of climate anxiety and greater participation in sustainable travel practices. Therefore, the research highlights the crucial role of climate anxiety in the formation of sustainable behavioral intentions. In conclusion, several suggestions have been made for the stakeholders and policymakers of the tourism industry. It’s of utmost importance for them to develop strategies and organize campaigns to raise awareness because, with proper guidance, climate anxiety is thought to act as a strong motivator for encouraging people to adopt sustainable practices. The study contributes theoretically to the literature on climate psychology and sustainable tourism by clarifying the awareness–emotion–behavior relationship in the tourism context; it also provides practical recommendations for destination managers and policymakers to develop communication strategies and campaigns that channel climate anxiety into encouraging low-carbon travel choices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Hüseyin Keleş, Department of Tourism Guidance, Manavgat Tourism Faculty, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

    Hüseyin Keleş is an associate professor in the Department of Tourism Guidance at Manavgat Tourism Faculty, Akdeniz University (Türkiye). His primary research interests include tourism management, sustainable tourism development, local people, and environmental issues. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in tourism management, destination studies, and sustainable tourism, and actively engages in interdisciplinary collaborations, applied research, and sectoral projects promoting sustainable and responsible tourism practices.

  • Guray Karacıl, Antakya Vocational School, Travel-Tourism and Entertainment Services Department, Tourism and Travel Services Program, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey.

    Güray Karacıl is an assistant professor in the Tourism and Travel Services Program at Antakya Vocational School, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University (Türkiye). His primary research interests include sustainable regional development, tourism and hotel management, rural tourism planning, sports tourism, and sustainable tourism. He teaches undergraduate courses in tourism and travel services and actively contributes to academic research and applied projects focused on sustainable and regional tourism development.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Keleş, H., & Karacıl, G. (2026). Climate Change Awareness and Sustainable Travel Intentions: The Mediating Role of Climate Anxiety. Journal of Tourism and Services, 17(32), 141-169. https://doi.org/10.29036/v0wmyc78